malasha72 malasha72
  • 21-01-2022
  • Business
contestada

Why should relevant costs be reflected in the objective function but not sunk costs?

Respuesta :

dakotalopez37
dakotalopez37 dakotalopez37
  • 21-01-2022

Answer:

Sunk costs (past costs) or committed costs are not relevant. Sunk, or past, costs are monies already spent or money that is already contracted to be spent. A decision on whether or not a new endeavour is started will have no effect on this cash flow, so sunk costs cannot be relevant.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Solve the system of equations by graphing. y= -3x + 18 3x - 2y = 0 Select the correct choice below​ and, if​ necessary, fill in the answer box to complete your
which of the following is a regular polygon?a: rectangleB:circlec:equalterial triangleD: trapezoid​
In a particular chemical reaction, the energy of the reactants is 30 kJ and the energy of theproducts is 5 kJ. The maximum energy of the system is 40 kJ. Sket
Question 12(Multiple Choice Worth 1 points) (03.01 LC) The leg of a right triangle is 3 units and the hypotenuse is 4 units. What is the length, in units, of th
Approximately 80% of India practices which religion?
can u help with question 18
100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST The map below shows Tyler's house and the houses of two of his friends, Pedro and Jake. On the map, each unit square represents 1 squ
How do you do number 4
What percent was a television set reduced if it was marked $225 and sold for $195?
What is the religion that is unique to Japan